Skip to main content
Operations & CRM

Weight and Balance Documentation for Part 135: Requirements After the NTSB Report

What proper W&B documentation looks like and why the NTSB flagged it as a critical Part 135 safety gap.

Navlyt Editorial TeamNavlyt Editorial TeamNavlytPublished 3/20/2026Updated 4/7/20268 min read
Share: LinkedIn X
Weight and Balance Documentation for Part 135: Requirements After the NTSB Report

What the NTSB found about weight and balance in Part 135

The NTSB's AIR-24-03 special investigation report analyzed 576 Part 135 accidents over 12 years and identified weight and balance deficiencies as a recurring safety gap — particularly in single-engine operations where loading conditions exceeded aircraft limits.

Five specific incidents causing 11 fatalities were linked to improper weight and balance documentation. The NTSB recommended mandatory W&B documentation for all Part 135 aircraft operations, not just those currently required.

Current Part 135 weight and balance requirements

Under 14 CFR 135.63(c), operators must prepare and maintain load manifests for each flight. The manifest must include the number of passengers, total weight of passengers, baggage, and cargo, and the computed center of gravity.

For aircraft with 10+ passenger seats, weight and balance calculations must use actual passenger weights or approved standard weights per AC 120-27E. For smaller aircraft, actual weights are strongly recommended.

14 CFR 135.63(c); AC 120-27E

Weight and balance best practices for charter operators

Calculate W&B for every flight, not just when loads appear close to limits. Errors compound — a consistently underestimated basic empty weight plus standard passenger weights plus unweighed baggage can easily exceed limits without triggering alarms.

Use digital W&B tools that calculate center of gravity in real time and flag exceedances before dispatch. Paper-based calculations are slower, more error-prone, and harder to audit.

Retain completed load manifests for the required period and store them in a retrievable format. Link manifests to trip records in Navlyt TripDesk for unified trip documentation.

Special considerations for single-engine operations

Single-engine Part 135 operations face the highest W&B risk because payload margins are smaller, CG ranges are narrower, and overloading directly impacts climb performance.

For single-engine operations: always use actual weights for passengers and baggage, verify CG position against the approved loading envelope, and brief pilots on the importance of refusing overweight loads even under customer pressure.

Compliance warning

The NTSB's report specifically cited single-engine Part 135 operations as the highest-risk category for weight and balance deficiencies.

Navlyt tracks this automatically

Turn recurring compliance work into automated tasks and evidence trails.

Start Free Trial

Key takeaways

  • The NTSB identified W&B deficiencies as a recurring Part 135 safety gap.
  • Load manifests are required for every Part 135 flight under 14 CFR 135.63(c).
  • Use digital tools for real-time CG calculations and exceedance alerts.
  • Single-engine operations face the highest W&B risk and should always use actual weights.
  • Retain and link load manifests to trip records for audit readiness.

Author

Navlyt Editorial Team

Navlyt Editorial Team

Navlyt

Written by the Navlyt team. Guides reference the specific regulations they discuss and are general information, not legal or regulatory advice — confirm requirements for your operation with your FSDO or compliance officer.

Was this helpful?

Stay ahead of regulatory changes

Stay ahead of regulatory changes and compliance deadlines.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related posts