Manual review software for aviation compliance consultants
Read a 300-page GOM the way you always have — but let the software do the first pass, with every proposed finding quoting the exact manual text and the requirement it maps to.
A compliance consultant's product is judgment, but most of a manual-review engagement is not judgment — it is locating. Finding the paragraph that addresses §135.293, confirming whether the wording actually satisfies it, cross-referencing the training program against the checking requirements, and doing all of it again for the next revision.
Navlyt runs that first pass in minutes. The manual is parsed and mapped against the FAA 14 CFR Part 135 and Part 91 requirement corpus; where a requirement is not clearly addressed, a finding is proposed with the severity, the mapped clause, and a quotation of the operator's own text — verified verbatim against the source before it is ever shown.
Your judgment stays where it belongs: every finding is a proposal until you accept or dismiss it, and your disposition is recorded with reviewer and timestamp. The deliverable — findings, dispositions, corrective actions, and document status — exports as a report your client can hand to their POI.
The first pass, in minutes instead of days
The economics of a review engagement change when the locating work is automated. Instead of a week of highlighting, you get a working session adjudicating proposed findings, each with its evidence already attached — and each run states how many pages it covered, so you know exactly what was and was not read.
- Clause-level mapping against Part 135 / Part 91 requirements
- Findings quote the operator's manual verbatim — verified against the source
- Severity classification you can adjust on review
- Re-run on the next revision and see what changed
Your name goes on it, so you control it
Nothing in Navlyt bypasses the reviewer. Findings are proposals; you accept, dismiss, or reclassify each one, and your dispositions form the record. The software's role is evidence assembly — quoting the manual, citing the requirement — so that the report you sign is defensible line by line.
One workspace per client
Each operator's documents, findings, and corrective actions live in their own isolated workspace — separation enforced at the database layer, not just by folder discipline. Move between clients without their data ever touching.
- Per-operator isolation enforced server-side
- Role-based access: your client's team sees their workspace, you see yours
- Exportable PDF evidence reports to hand to a client or their auditor
Deliverables your client can use the next day
Findings and corrective actions export as PDF reports. Accepted findings become tracked corrective actions with owners and target dates in the client's own workspace — so the engagement ends with a live remediation plan, not a binder that goes on a shelf.
Frequently asked questions
Does the AI replace my review?
No — it replaces the locating, not the judgment. Every finding is a proposal carrying the quoted manual text and mapped requirement; nothing stands until you disposition it. Consultants tell us the value is walking into the adjudication with the evidence already assembled.
How do I know a citation is real?
Navlyt verifies every quotation against the source document before showing it. If the words cannot be found verbatim in the manual, the citation is withheld and the finding is flagged for manual review instead — the software never invents a quote.
Can I manage several clients at once?
Yes. Each client is a separate operator workspace with database-level isolation. You switch between them; their data never crosses.
What regulations are covered today?
FAA 14 CFR Part 135 and the Part 91 provisions it cross-references. EASA Part-ORO and Transport Canada CARs are on the roadmap — stated plainly, because our own product exists to catch overclaims in other people's documents.
Whose account do the corrective actions live in?
The client's workspace. When the engagement ends, they keep a live remediation plan with owners and dates — and you keep a clean separation from their ongoing data.
Is there a way to show a regulator or auditor a subset?
Export a PDF evidence report scoped to the findings you choose — each one carrying its cited manual text, its disposition and who signed it off. Read-only external access links are on the roadmap, not shipped.
Related reading
Run your next review through Navlyt
Bring a client manual (with their permission) to a 30-minute demo and see the first pass land with citations attached.