Skip to main content
Compliance Guides

Part 135 Operational Control: Who Is Responsible and How to Document It

The single most litigated concept in Part 135 — and how to document it clearly in your operation.

Navlyt Editorial TeamNavlyt Editorial TeamNavlytPublished 3/12/2026Updated 4/7/202610 min read
Share: LinkedIn X
Part 135 Operational Control: Who Is Responsible and How to Document It

Defining operational control under Part 135

Operational control is the exercise of authority over initiating, conducting, or terminating a flight. Under 14 CFR 1.1 and 135.77, the certificate holder bears this responsibility for every flight conducted under their certificate.

This is not a theoretical concept. It determines who is legally responsible when things go wrong — and it is the basis for the FAA's enforcement against illegal charter operations.

14 CFR 1.1; 14 CFR 135.77

Certificate holder responsibilities vs. PIC authority

The certificate holder is responsible for operational control of the flight — this includes dispatch authority, go/no-go decisions at the organizational level, crew assignment, and aircraft airworthiness verification.

The PIC has final authority for the safe operation of the flight once dispatched. This includes the authority to refuse a flight for safety reasons. These authorities complement each other but do not overlap.

How management agreements affect operational control

Aircraft management agreements are where operational control questions become complex. When a certificate holder manages aircraft for an owner, the certificate holder must maintain operational control — meaning the owner cannot direct crew scheduling, route selection, or flight operations.

If a management agreement allows the owner to override the certificate holder's operational decisions, the arrangement may not be a valid Part 135 operation. Have your aviation attorney review every management agreement for operational control clarity.

For more on illegal charter risks, see our guide to operational control and FAA enforcement.

Documenting operational control in your GOM

Your GOM must clearly define: who has dispatch authority and under what conditions, the flight release process, who can cancel or divert flights, crew duty assignment authority, and how operational control is maintained during all phases of operation.

Document the operational control chain for every flight — from initial dispatch through flight completion. This evidence is your primary defense if operational control is ever questioned.

The NTSB's push for certificated dispatchers in Part 135

The NTSB has recommended that the FAA require certificated dispatchers for Part 135 operations, similar to Part 121 requirements. While not yet mandated, this recommendation signals a regulatory direction that operators should prepare for.

Even without a mandate, implementing structured dispatch procedures with documented operational control decisions strengthens your compliance posture and safety management.

Navlyt tracks this automatically

Turn recurring compliance work into automated tasks and evidence trails.

Start Free Trial

Key takeaways

  • Operational control is the legal foundation of your Part 135 authority.
  • The certificate holder controls dispatch; the PIC controls flight safety.
  • Management agreements must preserve the certificate holder's operational control.
  • Document the operational control chain for every flight in your GOM.
  • The NTSB has recommended certificated dispatchers for Part 135 — prepare now.

Author

Navlyt Editorial Team

Navlyt Editorial Team

Navlyt

Written by the Navlyt team. Guides reference the specific regulations they discuss and are general information, not legal or regulatory advice — confirm requirements for your operation with your FSDO or compliance officer.

Was this helpful?

Stay ahead of regulatory changes

Stay ahead of regulatory changes and compliance deadlines.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related posts